I was at Costco today and while passing the magazine rack the cover of The Economist caught my eye. Quickly perused the article on Gendercide: The war on baby girls | Killed, aborted or neglected, at least 100m girls have disappeared—and the number is rising. I’m not a regular reader at all of The Economist, but this one is worth your time.
I’m admittedly curious about the kind of response this article would generate, particularly from pro-choice people. If it’s okay to abort babies, why wouldn’t it be okay to choose which babies should survive? And if it’s not right to decide which gender is allowed to survive, could it be that it’s not right to decide which lives are worth terminating either? If you think it’s okay for people to terminate a pregnancy, then you should also be completely okay with the thinking that females are expendable. And you should agree that when people are given the opportunity and the means to do away with a particular segment of the population, they WILL use that opportunity for whatever reason they deem appropriate.
This is just one consequence of the abortion and anti-family mentality, and its implications reverberate throughout.
Recent Comments